12 November, 2008

Shut that door!

It's time for retailers to close their front doors. Not only do open doors admit traffic noise and fumes; they also let out vast amounts of wasted energy. A new UK pressure group called Close The Door estimates the cost at hundreds of millions of pounds a year, and is gathering excellent media coverage and growing political support: there's a private member's bill due in Parliament at the end of this year.

In the US, the Long Island Power Authority estimated that retailers waste 20 to 25 percent of the energy they consume by allowing air-conditioned cool air to waft out onto the sidewalk - and in some areas the proportion of shops with their doors open as a matter of policy was a high as 65 percent. According to LIPA Chairman Richard M Kessel:

“Customers should ask the stores to close their doors. What good does it do to worry about such issues as air quality, global warming and high energy prices when one is scooting in an out of stores that waste 20 to 25 percent of the electricity they use? The message from customers should be: Be Cool – Keep it Closed.”

Now New York's Mayor Bloomberg has passed legislation banning shops from leaving their doors open while running their AC. But in the UK the practice remains common in summer and winter alike. A stroll down London's Oxford Street reveals that the vast majority of store doors are wide open, leaking energy and admitting noise and fumes. In my book I wrote this about the aural consequences:

I have stood in booth-like cell-phone outlets on Oxford Street wondering aghast how the people who work in there survive without therapy, and how any sensible business conversations take place at all. To add insult to injury, some of them are playing semi-audible music, presumably in the hope that this will make everything fine. It doesn’t.

I speculated that the noisy and smelly front few metres of many stores is effectively dead space, with much lower takings per metre than the more comfortable back part of the store, negating any benefits retailers claim from their open doors letting more people in; also, closed doors stop people from leaving just as much as they stop them from entering.

I would love to see a return to the old-fashioned system of revolving doors, which keep the noise out, the energy in and require no power to operate at all. An extra aural (and also environmental) benefit would be getting rid of those noisy and wasteful hot air blowers that many stores use instead of air curtains.

Shops with closed doors would be quieter, calmer and much more pleasant places to be, and I believe sales would increase - as long as the retailers also control their habit of playing mindless music, which surveys have shown upsets at least a third of their customers.

I welcome the new campaign and look forward to some sensible legislation on this in the UK very soon.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

5 comments:

  1. I would be interested to know what the solution would be that would still allow access for people in wheelchairs, or people with other kinds of limited movement.

    I agree that this kind of energy waste is something that needs to be sorted, but I can see some problems with doors.

    Revolving or hinged doors would limit access for certain people (those with wheelchairs for example).

    Sliding doors rely on sensors to open, and on a busy street, those doors would be open all the time anyway with the people that just walked by.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mr. Treasure, nice to see you! I've read your book and I've learned very useful things about music and customers. At the end of this month I'm going to discuss about these things in a semiotics meeting. I think you got the point, in this post: why do we declare ourselves against global warming and let this waste of energy happen? And we let traffic noise and pollution enter into shops, while clerks go crazy and sick, unable to consider the customers...

    ReplyDelete
  3. You're right of course - revolving doors would need to be supplemented by automatic doors with push-button operation. Thanks for the correction.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Mik, glad you enjoyed the book.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't think it's such a difficult or expensive thing to do. Obviously, this solution suits to small shops, where people buy small things, not too much heavy or bigsized. And it seems to me an elegant solution...

    ReplyDelete

I welcome your feedback!